The unbreakable brain pdf download
I for one would have liked more information to explain why the police didn't act on the information received the first time, Shelly was never even questioned? The conclusion was pretty disappointing in so far as it left even more blanks.
Nothing really was explained in any detail, they were arrested. She pled guilty but not guilty really? They went to jail. He gets out. Kids take him back into the fold, whilst Shelly is still in denial saying it's all a mistake.
I stuck with this expecting more and sadly got less and less. Dan McDonald. Dark, Disturbing, Drawn Out, and Ultimately Dissatisfying If you're going to write a book about a mentally ill, sadistic serial killer you should probably spend more time talking about her mental illness or at least trying to explain the "why" instead of just the "what.
Was Shelly suffering from borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, both? What would the experts say? Was she just evil? An epilogue at the end that only gives superficial treatment to these issues and, particularly, the psychology behind why victims stay and don't report is extremely dissatisfying. I just don't like reading about human misery without at least some ability to understand why or how it occurred.
Giving the reader more tools to do that would have been appreciated. It took me no time at all to read this. Well you hear about crimes and crazy things ppl do or split minute decisions made in haste, but I have never heard of someone like the mother in this story. She had a switch. She seemed to have a hair trigger. The book even remarked on that. It also well documents and shows you exactly what this means.
Happy to horribly mean, calm to hellaciously evil and vengeful. Or maybe in her formative years she did not get the type of nurturing care she needed when she was developing; during the most crucial parts of her personality development.
Right when she would have been learning how to process emotions. Download Download PDF. Translate PDF. Preamble: Over dependent of Governments and Businesses in technology give birth to the rising wave of cybercrime. Cyber terrorism is also on the increase. In the near future, wars between nations will be shifted from the physical combat to cyber space.
Cyber wars will be valuable tools in the hands of the enemies against world powers; cybercrime will also be a million dollar business. In the light of this, we will need clear and concise techniques in fighting cybercrime thereby reducing it to the barest minimum. This crime can be difficult to control or prevent as the attackers are often times faceless, the attacker can be your next door neighbor or a person in a different geographical location or continent.
This type of crime can be targeted toward Government, Agencies, Ministries, and Businesses irrespective of size and even individuals. The skills required of an attacker is dropping by the day as there are freely available and downloadable tools on the internet that even script kiddies can download and run against any vulnerable target without understanding what the tools does.
Attacks techniques are also getting sophisticated as more and more tools are out there that try to make the attacked extremely difficult if not impossible to detect. With this, it is therefore my desire to research into ways of controlling, preventing and investigating where possible the cybercrime activities of the cyber space, thereby making our cyberspace maximally secured since there cannot be total security.
By so doing it will boost our economic gains from the cyber space. The procurement and retention of highly skill cybercrime expert by Government and Business Enterprises cannot be overemphasized.
This will ensure compliance with international acceptable standard of usage of computer and other technological devices in the work places. Although prevention as they say is better than cure, irrespective of the deterrent measures to prevent and or control cybercrime, there may still be breaches, where this occur, Forensics Experts will be called in to conduct a sound digital forensic investigations, analysis, documentation and reconstruction of the crime scene and present the evidence of the findings to Engr.
Information stored in Human brain, electronic devices physical media and those on transit needs to be protected. Hence the urge for this research topic.
This research will therefore be broken down into three major categories namely: 1. In this already altered state, the music seems to grow more intense, to swell, to take possession of him, and at this point, he cannot stop the process, cannot turn off the music or walk away from it. Beyond this point he retains no consciousness or memory, although various ictal automatisms and automatic behaviours ensue. For Mr G. I have sometimes been given similar descriptions by patients whose seizures are not provoked by music, but contain hallucinatory music as a prominent feature.
One such patient, Eric M. I am afraid that if I pay too much attention to it, I may not be able to escape it—like quicksand, or hypnosis. Our auditory systems, our nervous systems, are tuned for music. Perhaps we are a musical species no less than a linguistic one. But there seems to be in us a peculiar sensitivity to music, a sensitivity that can all too easily slip out of control, become excessive, become a susceptibility or a vulnerability. This is the other side of the otherwise wonderful power of music.
We do not even know why, for instance, simple stroboscopic light displays can excite hallucinations, myoclonus and seizures, and this is an infinitely simpler matter than the powers of music. When Crichtley and Henson's Music and the Brain was published in , functional brain imaging still lay in the future, and neuroscience had yet to approach the neural correlates of musical perception, imagery and memory or their disorders. In the last 20 years, there have been huge advances here, but we have, as yet, scarcely touched the question of why music, for better or worse, has so much power.
It is a question that goes to the heart of being human. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account.
Sign In. Advanced Search. Search Menu. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Article Contents. The power of music. Oliver Sacks Oliver Sacks. E-mail: mail oliversacks. Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. The same could be said for countries that do not recognize the need to focus on building their innovation ecosystems accordingly. To sum up, I believe that the combination of structural factors over- indebtedness and ageing societies and systemic ones the introduction of the platform and on-demand economies, the increasing relevance of decreasing marginal costs, etc.
The fourth industrial revolution has the potential both to increase economic growth and to alleviate some of the major global challenges we collectively face. We need, however, to also recognize and manage the negative impacts it can have, particularly with regard to inequality, employment and labour markets.
Fears about the impact of technology on jobs are not new. Over the past few years, the debate has been reignited by evidence of computers substituting for a number of jobs, most notably bookkeepers, cashiers and telephone operators. The reasons why the new technology revolution will provoke more upheaval than the previous industrial revolutions are those already mentioned in the introduction: speed everything is happening at a much faster pace than ever before , breadth and depth so many radical changes are occurring simultaneously , and the complete transformation of entire systems.
In light of these driving factors, there is one certainty: New technologies will dramatically change the nature of work across all industries and occupations. The fundamental uncertainty has to do with the extent to which automation will substitute for labour. How long will this take and how far will it go? To get a grasp on this, we have to understand the two competing effects that technology exercises on employment. First, there is a destruction effect as technology-fuelled disruption and automation substitute capital for labour, forcing workers to become unemployed or to reallocate their skills elsewhere.
As human beings, we have an amazing ability for adaptation and ingenuity. But the key here is the timing and extent to which the capitalization effect supersedes the destruction effect, and how quickly the substitution will take. There are roughly two opposing camps when it comes to the impact of emerging technologies on the labour market: those who believe in a happy ending — in which workers displaced by technology will find new jobs, and where technology will unleash a new era of prosperity; and those who believe it will lead to a progressive social and political Armageddon by creating technological unemployment on a massive scale.
History shows that the outcome is likely to be somewhere in the middle. The question is: What should we do to foster more positive outcomes and help those caught in the transition? It has always been the case that technological innovation destroys some jobs, which it replaces in turn with new ones in a different activity and possibly in another place.
Take agriculture as an example. This dramatic downsizing took place relatively smoothly, with minimal social disruption or endemic unemployment. The app economy provides an example of a new job ecosystem. It only began in when Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple, let outside developers create applications for the iPhone. The techno-optimists ask: If we extrapolate from the past, why should it be different this time? They acknowledge that technology can be disruptive but claim that it always ends up improving productivity and increasing wealth, leading in turn to greater demand for goods and services and new types of jobs to satisfy it.
The substance of the argument goes as follows: Human needs and desires are infinite so the process of supplying them should also be infinite. Barring the normal recessions and occasional depressions, there will always be work for everybody. The early signs point to a wave of labour-substitutive innovation across multiple industries and job categories which will likely happen in the coming decades.
Labour substitution Many different categories of work, particularly those that involve mechanically repetitive and precise manual labour, have already been automated. Many others will follow, as computing power continues to grow exponentially. Sooner than most anticipate, the work of professions as different as lawyers, financial analysts, doctors, journalists, accountants, insurance underwriters or librarians may be partly or completely automated.
So far, the evidence is this: The fourth industrial revolution seems to be creating fewer jobs in new industries than previous revolutions. This is corroborated by a recent US Economic Census, which sheds some interesting light on the relationship between technology and unemployment. It shows that innovations in information and other disruptive technologies tend to raise productivity by replacing existing workers, rather than creating new products needing more labour to produce them.
In addition, the trend is towards greater polarization in the labour market. Employment will grow in high-income cognitive and creative jobs and low-income manual occupations, but it will greatly diminish for middle-income routine and repetitive jobs. This job simplification means that algorithms are better able to replace humans.
Discrete, well-defined tasks lead to better monitoring and more high-quality data around the task, thereby creating a better base from which algorithms can be designed to do the work. In thinking about the automation and the phenomenon of substitution, we should resist the temptation to engage in polarized thinking about the impact of technology on employment and the future of work. But this does not mean that we face a man-versus-machine dilemma.
In fact, in the vast majority of cases, the fusion of digital, physical and biological technologies driving the current changes will serve to enhance human labour and cognition, meaning that leaders need to prepare workforces and develop education models to work with, and alongside, increasingly capable, connected and intelligent machines.
Impact on skills In the foreseeable future, low-risk jobs in terms of automation will be those that require social and creative skills; in particular, decision-making under uncertainty and the development of novel ideas.
This, however, may not last. Consider one of the most creative professions — writing — and the advent of automated narrative generation. Sophisticated algorithms can create narratives in any style appropriate to a particular audience. The content is so human-sounding that a recent quiz by The New York Times showed that when reading two similar pieces, it is impossible to tell which one has been written by a human writer and which one is the product of a robot.
These trends vary by industry and geography, and so it is important to understand the industry and country-specific outcomes of the fourth industrial revolution. As Figure 1 shows, survey respondents believe that complex problem solving, social and systems skills will be far more in demand in when compared to physical abilities or content skills.
The report finds that the next five years are a critical period of transition: the overall employment outlook is flat but there is significant job churn within industries and skill churn within most occupations.
While wages and work-life balance are expected to improve slightly for most occupations, job security is expected to worsen in half of the industries surveyed. It is also clear that women and men will be affected differently, potentially exacerbating gender inequality see Box A: Gender Gaps and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
First, at the current pace of progress, it will take another years before economic gender parity is achieved around the world. Second, progress towards parity is remarkably slow, and possibly stalling. In light of this, it is critical to consider the impact of the fourth industrial revolution on the gender gap.
How will the accelerating pace of change in technologies that span the physical, digital and biological worlds affect the role that women are able to play in the economy, politics and society? An important question to consider is whether female-dominated or male- dominated professions are more susceptible to automation.
Losing a job has negative effects in many circumstances, but the cumulative effect of significant losses across whole job categories that have traditionally given women access to the labour market is a critical concern. Specifically, it will put at risk single-income households headed by low- skilled women, depress total earnings in two-income families, and widen the already-troubling gender gap around the world.
But what about new roles and job categories? What new opportunities could exist for women in a labour market transformed by the fourth industrial revolution? While it is difficult to map the competencies and skills expected in industries not yet created, we can reasonably assume that demand will increase for skills that enable workers to design, build and work alongside technological systems, or in areas that fill the gaps left by these technological innovations.
Because men still tend to dominate computer science, mathematical and engineering professions, increased demand for specialized technical skills may exacerbate gender inequalities. Yet demand may grow for roles that machines cannot fulfil and which rely on intrinsically human traits and capabilities such as empathy and compassion.
Women are prevalent in many such occupations including psychologists, therapists, coaches, event planners, nurses and other providers of healthcare. A key issue here is the relative return on time and effort for roles requiring different technical capabilities, as there is a risk that personal services and other currently female-dominated job categories will remain undervalued.
This would be a negative outcome of the fourth industrial revolution, as it would increase both inequality overall and the gender gap, making it more difficult for women to leverage their talents in the workforce of the future. Many of the traits and capabilities traditionally associated with women and female professions will be much more needed in the era of the fourth industrial revolution.
While we cannot predict the different impact on men and women that the fourth industrial revolution will have, we should take the opportunity of a transforming economy to redesign labour policies and business practices to ensure that both men and women are empowered to their full extent.
Today, we cannot foresee exactly what these will be but I am convinced that talent, more than capital, will represent the critical production factor. For this reason, scarcity of a skilled workforce rather the availability of capital is more likely to be the crippling limit to innovation, competiveness and growth.
Traditional definitions of skilled labour rely on the presence of advanced or specialised education and a set of defined capabilities within a profession or domain of expertise. Given the increasing rate of change of technologies, the fourth industrial revolution will demand and place more emphasis on the ability of workers to adapt continuously and learn new skills and approaches within a variety of contexts.
As a consequence, there is a mismatch between the magnitude of the upcoming changes and the relatively marginal actions being taken by companies to address these challenges.
Organizations require a new mindset to meet their own talent needs and to mitigate undesirable societal outcomes. Impact on developing economies It is important to reflect upon what this might mean for developing countries. As yet, the precise impact of the fourth industrial revolution remains to be seen. In recent decades, although there has been a rise in inequality within countries, the disparity across countries has decreased significantly.
Does the fourth industrial revolution risk reversing the narrowing of the gaps between economies that we have seen to date in terms of income, skills, infrastructure, finance and other areas? Or will technologies and rapid changes be harnessed for development and hasten leapfrogging?
These difficult questions must be given the attention they require, even at a time when the most advanced economies are preoccupied with their own challenges.
Ensuring that swathes of the globe are not left behind is not a moral imperative; it is a critical goal that would mitigate the risk of global instability due to geopolitical and security challenges such as migration flows. If this pathway closes, many countries will have to rethink their models and strategies of industrialization. Whether and how developing economies can leverage the opportunities of the fourth industrial revolution is a matter of profound importance to the world; it is essential that further research and thinking be undertaken to understand, develop and adapt the strategies required.
The danger is that the fourth industrial revolution would mean that a winner- takes-all dynamic plays out between countries as well as within them. This would further increase social tensions and conflicts, and create a less cohesive, more volatile world, particularly given that people are today much more aware of and sensitive to social injustices and the discrepancies in living conditions between different countries. It is crucial that people are secure in the belief that they can engage in meaningful work to support themselves and their families, but what happens if there is insufficient demand for labour, or if the skills available no longer match the demand?
Today, the on-demand economy is fundamentally altering our relationship with work and the social fabric in which it is embedded. Professional activities are dissected into precise assignments and discrete projects and then thrown into a virtual cloud of aspiring workers located anywhere in the world. This is the new on-demand economy, where providers of labour are no longer employees in the traditional sense but rather independent workers who perform specific tasks.
As human cloud platforms classify workers as self-employed, they are — for the moment — free of the requirement to pay minimum wages, employer taxes and social benefits. Some independent workers see this as offering the ideal combination of a lot of freedom, less stress and greater job satisfaction. Although the human cloud is in its infancy, there is already substantial anecdotal evidence that it entails silent offshoring silent because human cloud platforms are not listed and do not have to disclose their data.
Is this the beginning of a new and flexible work revolution that will empower any individual who has an internet connection and that will eliminate the shortage of skills? Or will it trigger the onset of an inexorable race to the bottom in a world of unregulated virtual sweatshops?
If the result is the latter — a world of the precariat, a social class of workers who move from task to task to make ends meet while suffering a loss of labour rights, bargaining rights and job security — would this create a potent source of social unrest and political instability?
Finally, could the development of the human cloud merely accelerate the automation of human jobs? The challenge we face is to come up with new forms of social and employment contracts that suit the changing workforce and the evolving nature of work. We must limit the downside of the human cloud in terms of possible exploitation, while neither curtailing the growth of the labour market nor preventing people from working in the manner they choose.
It entirely depends on the policy and institutional decisions we make. One has to be aware, however, that a regulatory backlash could happen, thereby reasserting the power of policymakers in the process and straining the adaptive forces of a complex system. The importance of purpose We must also keep in mind that it is not only about talent and skills. Technology enables greater efficiency, which most people want. Yet they also wish to feel that they are not merely part of a process but of something bigger than themselves.
This is particularly the case for the younger generation who often feel that corporate jobs constrain their ability to find meaning and purpose in life. In a world where boundaries are disappearing and aspirations are changing, people want not only work-life balance but also harmonious work-life integration. I am concerned that the future of work will only allow a minority of individuals to achieve such fulfilment.
There is no doubt that emerging technologies, almost always powered and enabled by digital capabilities, are increasing the speed and scale of change for businesses.
This also reinforces an underlying theme in my conversations with global CEOs and senior business executives; namely, that the deluge of information available today, the velocity of disruption and the acceleration of innovation are hard to comprehend or anticipate.
They constitute a source of constant surprise. Is there evidence of the organization and leadership capacity to learn and change? Is there a track record of prototyping and investment decision-making at a fast pace?
Does the culture accept innovation and failure? Everything I see indicates that the ride will only get faster, the changes will be fundamental, and the journey will therefore require a hard and honest look at the ability of organizations to operate with speed and agility. Sources of disruption Multiple sources of disruption trigger different forms of business impact. Examples abound. New storage and grid technologies in energy will accelerate the shift towards more decentralized sources.
The widespread adoption of 3D printing will make distributed manufacturing and spare-part maintenance easier and cheaper. Real-time information and intelligence will provide unique insights on customers and asset performance that will amplify other technological trends. Disruption also flows from agile, innovative competitors who, by accessing global digital platforms for research, development, marketing, sales and distribution, can overtake well established incumbents faster than ever by improving the quality, speed or price at which they deliver value.
This is the reason why many business leaders consider their biggest threat to be competitors that are not yet regarded as such. It would be a mistake, however, to think that competitive disruption will come only through start- ups.
Digitization also enables large incumbents to cross industry boundaries by leveraging their customer base, infrastructure or technology. The move of telecommunications companies into healthcare and automotive segments are examples. Size can still be a competitive advantage if smartly leveraged.
Major shifts on the demand side are also disrupting business: Increasing transparency, consumer engagement and new patterns of consumer behaviour increasingly built upon access to mobile networks and data force companies to adapt the way they design, market and deliver existing and new products and services. Overall, I see the impact of the fourth industrial revolution on business as an inexorable shift from the simple digitization that characterized the third industrial revolution to a much more complex form of innovation based on the combination of multiple technologies in novel ways.
This is forcing all companies to re-examine the way they do business and takes different forms. For some companies, capturing new frontiers of value may consist of developing new businesses in adjacent segments, while for others, it is about identifying shifting pockets of value in existing sectors. The bottom line, however, remains the same.
Business leaders and senior executives need to understand that disruption affects both the demand and supply sides of their business. In short, they have to innovate continuously. Four major impacts The fourth industrial revolution has four main effects on business across industries: — customer expectations are shifting — products are being enhanced by data, which improves asset productivity — new partnerships are being formed as companies learn the importance of new forms of collaboration, and — operating models are being transformed into new digital models.
Customer expectations are being redefined into experiences. I believe anyone can achieve success in their life. To achieve any kind of success we need to learn many things. Becoming highly productive is one of them. Many people believe that setting goals are enough to achieve any kind of success. But everything depends upon planning and implementing those things. Learning is not enough we must apply.
In my previous book, I have shared my thoughts and ideas related to goal setting. But in this book I am going to share information related to productivity and related topics. I am sure this book will work as a guide for anyone how are interested in learning. As usual, this book is written in the simplest way.
I have shared those ideas which I have learned from my mentor. Take the wheel of your life with monastic wisdom teachings from a surprisingly modern source. That traffic jam is stopping each one of us from reaching our true potential. Imagine if we knew how to clear this disruption. As it turns out, quite a bit. In The Way of the Monk, Gaur Gopal Das reveals that contemporary monastic life is far from our dour, isolated conception of it—and still has keen insights to share.
How can we achieve peace when the world is so full of noise and conflict? How do we learn to let go of attachment when consumer culture constantly tells us that we are unfulfilled?
How can we embody love when our interactions with others are so fraught with old wounds and misunderstanding? From the man who has inspired millions of people to transform their lives and create their heart's desire comes his latest book on seeking and embracing the power source within. Deepak Chopra has made clear his conviction that it is within the potential of every human being to live an enriching, self-aware, magnificent life. But to reach that state of empowerment is a difficult task, calling for courage, will power and - often - guidance.
In Self-Power, Chopra offers that guidance and encouragement, while inspiring his readers to take their lives into their own capable hands no matter what challenges they may confront--job loss, financial difficulties, relationship issues, health problems or spiritual questions.
Then one night, telling no one, he slipped out of his monastery in India with the intention of spending the next four years on a wandering retreat, following the ancient practice of holy mendicants.
His goal was to throw off his titles and roles in order to explore the deepest aspects of his being. He immediately discovered that a lifetime of Buddhist education and practice had not prepared him to deal with dirty fellow travelers or the screeching of a railway car.
He found he was too attached to his identity as a monk to remove his robes right away or to sleep on the Varanasi station floor, and instead paid for a bed in a cheap hostel. But when he ran out of money, he began his life as an itinerant beggar in earnest. Soon he became deathly ill from food poisoning—and his journey took a startling turn.
0コメント